Hong Kong’s RBC regime signals a new era
Hong Kong’s new risk-based capital regime came into play quietly this year, bringing significant change for insurers. There is also proposed regulation for re-domiciliation in which many insurers have already expressed an interest. Asia Insurance Review caught up with Insurance Authority’s Mr Clement Cheung.
By Sarah Si
The most recent regulatory change to Hong Kong’s insurance industry over the past year was the implementation of the risk-based capital (RBC) regime in July 2024.
While Insurance Authority (IA) CEO Clement Cheung called the regime coming into effect uneventful, he also said that it “[heralded] a new era for the Hong Kong insurance industry”.
“Aligning capital requirements with risk profiles, this solvency framework is sensitive to asset and liability matching, product mix, economic valuation and corporate governance that will reinforce general stability of the market”, he said.
Implications of new RBC regime
Throughout the process of planning and implementation of the RBC regime, the insurance industry remained “responsive and pragmatic”, Mr Cheung said.
“All three iterative quantitative impact studies (QIS) took place during a period of unprecedented interest rate gyrations and high market volatility, which means that the risk parameters have been subject to vigorous stress testing,” he said.
According to the consultation paper on draft insurance (valuation and capital) rules and draft insurance (submission of statements, reports and information) rules, IA “started to develop detailed requirements for the RBC regime and conducted three rounds of QIS in consultation with the industry” upon the conclusion of the consultation in 2015.
“Nonetheless, there are suggestions that the framework should be reviewed and refined after it has been in place for about one year,” Mr Cheung said.
New technology
The application of innovative technologies could support IA’s mission of “deepening financial inclusion and narrowing protection gaps by reducing administrative costs, broadening access, modernising product design, improving customer experience and reaching out to underserved segments”, according to Mr Cheung.
In 2023, IA introduced the Open Application Programming Interface Framework for the Insurance Sector in Hong Kong, as well as a central register to “foster cross-sector partnership in harnessing information technology to provide more convenience for [policyholders]” he said.
“Other initiatives in the pipeline include a white paper on federated learning expected to be ready in early-2025 which aims at spurring machine learning without the need to share proprietary data,” he said.
Cyber security
“The survey findings and insights gleaned from other regulators convinced us that the Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework should be put in place so that insurers with gaps in control maturity can eliminate system weaknesses,” he said.
AI
Mr Cheung believes that if deployed correctly, AI can confer benefits in client acquisition, marketing, customer service and fraud detection.
“The immediate task in hand is to ensure that our regulatory framework remains robust enough to safeguard the interest of vulnerable groups but flexible and proportionate enough to fulfil industry aspirations.
“For this reason, we are contemplating a study to inform the approach that should be taken to promote fair, transparent and ethical use of AI while adequately addressing concerns about algorithmic bias and personal data leakage,” he said.
As supervisory technology modules were embedded into the revamped insurance system that is being progressively rolled out as well as surveillance tools sourced by IA’s enforcement division, and likely contain elements of AI, Mr Cheung said that the regulator will “draw up rules and protocols in anticipation of such a trend”.